A short review of the EU regulative for online disinformation
Disinformation causes many harmful societal consequences, such as, poses security threats; erodes the election system and process; it undermines the trust in the institutions; and, legally, it represents hampering of the freedom of opinion and expression – a fundamental right sanctified in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Recognizing that the fight against disinformation needs to be comprehensive and multi-faceted, at the end of 2017 the European Commission established a High – Level Expert Group to look into and advise on the matter.
The High – Level Expert Group, which was comprised of 39 experts – representatives from the media, online platforms, civil society and academia, helped in establishing the key criteria on which the forthcoming Code of Practice on Disinformation will be based on. Simultaneously, the Commission also launched a broad public consultation process through online questionnaires, structured dialogues with relevant stakeholders, as well as, a Eurobarometer opinion poll – polling 26.500,00 individuals from 28 Member States. The High – Level Expert Group’s effort resulted in the Report of the independent High-level Group on fake news and online disinformation. According to this Report, disinformation as a phenomenon goes beyond the “fake news” framework. Disinformation – as defined in the Report – includes all forms of false, inaccurate, or misleading information designed, presented and promoted to intentionally cause public harm or for profit.
Stemming from all this effort, in 2018 the Code of Practice on Disinformation was signed – on a voluntary basis, by representatives from online platforms, leading social media, advertisers and the advertising industry. Namely, for the first-time stakeholders from that industry has agreed upon a self-regulatory set of standards to fight against disinformation.
The Code is aimed at reaching the goals stated in the April 26th 2018 Commission communication – The Communication “Tackling online disinformation: a European approach. These goals are broad, reaching from the transparency of political and issue-based advertising, through tackling fake profiles and accounts, and their demonetization and closure in the case of disinformation.
Furthermore, the signatories presented their roadmaps to implement the Code. Together with the aforementioned measures of transparency in political advertising, these roadmaps also included effort in broader public education so people would know to raise the alarm once disinformation is encountered; to follow multiple sources of information; and also, to infuse more effort in promoting investigative informing.
Originating from the Code for each signatory was the responsibility for a baseline, monthly, and yearly report. Moreover, in addition to the original reporting requirement for all signatories, in the first semester of 2019, the European Commission closely monitored the reporting process of targeted signatories (Facebooк, Google, Twitter), especially in the light of the European Parliament elections that year.
During the 12 – months long trial period, the Commission evaluated the effectiveness of the Code. In September 2020, the effectiveness evaluation of the Code’s implementation was published, and in it, it’s valued as a useful instrument; however, it also highlights shortcomings, mainly in the terms of appropriate monitoring, clearer procedures, and more precise and comprehensive commitments.
Inspired by the COVID-19 pandemics’ inevitable impact on information, i.e., disinformation, the EU institutions issued a joint communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Tackling COVID-19 disinformation – Getting the facts right. In this Joint communication more measures to fight against disinformation were enumerated, such as improvement of cooperation and collaboration among the Member States, streamlining the existing mechanisms, cooperation with the civil society, establishment of a separate department within the EU’s Rapid Alert System, and other measures.
Through the European Democracy Action Plan and the Digital Services Act, the European Commission aims at overhauling the Code, making a firmer framework for responsibilities and reporting for all of the signatories.
In the meantime, in the spring of 2021, the Commission will issue guidance to enhance the current Code of Practice.
This article is supported by the Metamorphosis Foundation and Techsoup. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not always reflect the views of the Metamorphosis Foundation, Techsoup and C3I.
Other blog texts
Every minister boasted and took pictures about the project "One Point for Services" but it never succeeded
Collage of the visits of government officials to the offices of “One point for services” / Photo: State institutions The offices “One Point for Services” that were opened in Skopje, Kumanovo, Ohrid, Bitola and Tetovo in order for the citizens to say “goodbye” to waiting at the counters, will be closed and in their […]
Protecting Your Digital Identity: The Importance of "Cyber Hygiene"
In today’s digital age, it’s more important than ever to take steps to protect yourself from cyber threats. From viruses and malware to phishing scams and identity theft, there are a host of risks that can compromise your personal information and wreak havoc on your devices. That’s why practicing good cyber hygiene is essential to […]
Communicating digital transformation to the citizens – an important contribution to bridging the gap
Digital transformation is changing our lives in ways we could not have imagined even a few decades ago. It has brought new opportunities and challenges, and it is transforming the way we live, work, and communicate with each other. However, communicating digital transformation to citizens can be a challenge, especially in the Western Balkans, where […]
Institutions as a cause of privacy breaches in the media
Even if competent state authorities disclose private data of a perpetrator or a victim, media must not transmit that information. An error on the part of state authorities does not imply a “permission” for the violation of ethical principles of the profession. This is what the Serbian Journalists’ Code of Ethics says, but media practice […]
"ADA", the digital assistant based on artificial intelligence that will provide the citizens with information about state aid - Meta.mk News Agency
The digital assistant “ADA”; Photo: Government of the Republic of North Macedonia Investors and citizens will be able to receive information about the state aid programs of the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia through the first digital assistant “ADA” which is based on artificial intelligence. This is the information provided by the Cabinet […]
The application of artificial intelligence in state institutions is useful, however it is dangerous if misused - Meta.mk News Agency
Photo: Pixabay.com Portalb.mk writes that the use of artificial intelligence in the public sector would help to increase the quality of services, to save citizens’ time and money, but also to prevent corruption. However, if AI is used non-transparently, the consequences outweigh the benefits. This is what experts say about the impact of artificial intelligence […]